Sunday, July 3, 2011

Celebrating Independence Yet Enslaved To Debt...

Celebrating Independence Yet Enslaved To Debt

 year when July 4th rolls around, Americans from coast to coast celebrate July 4th with cookouts, outdoor concerts and fireworks.  We love celebrating Independence Day and yet we are deeply enslaved to debt.  We like to think of ourselves as “free” and yet we have rolled up the biggest pile of debt the world has ever seen.  The people that we have borrowed all of this money from expect to be paid.  Sadly, instead of addressing the problem, we have been loading more debt on to the backs of future generations with each passing year.  What we are doing to our kids and our grandkids is so immoral that is almost defies description.  At the heart of this debt-based system stands the Federal Reserve.  It is a perpetual debt machine that was designed to trap the U.S. government in a spiral of debt permanently.  Today, the U.S. national debt is 4700 times larger than it was when the Federal Reserve was created back in 1913.  This year alone, we will add more to the national debt than we did from the presidency of George Washington to the beginning of the presidency of Ronald Reagan.  So yes, enjoy the hotdogs and the fireworks, but also remember that we will never be free as long as this constantly expanding debt problem is hanging over our heads.
If you know anyone that does not take our national debt problem seriously, please share with them the video posted below.  It is entitled “Economic Armageddon and You” and it is definitely worth the 5 minutes that it takes to watch it.  Someone out there did a really great job of explaining our debt problem in a way that almost anyone can understand….
So is there any solution to this problem?
Not under the current system.
The debt-based Federal Reserve system is designed to expand U.S. government debt indefinitely.  But of course all debt bubbles burst eventually and we are rapidly reaching that point.
It is being projected that the U.S. national debt will hit 344% of GDP by the year 2050 if we continue on our current course.  The truth is that it would never get even close to that high because the whole system would completely collapse long before then.
So what should we do?
We need to abandon our current debt-based financial system.  The way that our current system normally works, whenever more money is created more debt is also created.  Such a system is inevitably doomed to fail.
We need to transition to an entirely new system that has nothing to do with the Federal Reserve or Federal Reserve notes.  We need an entirely new system where the money is not based on debt.
But even though more Americans than ever are awake to the flaws in our monetary system, the truth is that neither major political party is remotely ready to even consider an end to the current financial system.
Many Republicans believe that if we can just cut government spending enough we can solve the problem.  Many Democrats believe that if we can just “raise enough revenue” we can solve the problem.
Neither of those solutions will work.
Many conservatives are so frustrated with the whole thing that they just want Congress to refuse to raise the debt ceiling.  I have taken a lot of heat over the past couple of days for suggesting that this is a bad idea.
If we refuse to raise the debt ceiling, our borrowing costs will absolutely explode.  Even if the U.S. government adopted a “balanced budget” by some miracle, the reality is that the federal government would still need to “roll over” very large amounts of debt every single year.  If interest rates on U.S. debt rise substantially it will be beyond catastrophic.
In 2010, the U.S. government paid $413 billion in interest on the national debt.
If interest rates were to start rising as a result of a debt default, interest on the national debt would likely double or even triple.
Look, if we want to come anywhere close to balancing the budget under our current system, it will be a whole lot easier to do if we are spending 400 billion dollars on interest on the national debt rather than 1.2 trillion dollars.
Today, the U.S. government only takes in about 2.2 trillion dollars in taxes.  How in the world are we going to have a chance if we have to pay out a trillion dollars just in interest on the national debt?
The yield on 10-year U.S. Treasuries rose from 2.86% to 3.18% just this past week.  Let us hope that this is not the beginning of a bad trend.
A refusal to raise the debt ceiling would also likely set off another recession (or worse).  The following is what a new article on CNBC says would happen if the U.S. does not raise the debt ceiling by August 2nd….
A U.S. default would not only be historic, it would also almost certainly lead to a new financial crisis. Interest rates would likely spike, equity markets would plunge along with the value of the dollar, and the country could fall back into a recession.
We have to raise the debt ceiling.
So does this mean that I am advocating “kicking the can down the road”?
No.
If you are a conservative, you can still get the same result that you want without destroying the credit rating of the United States.
All the Republicans in Congress have to do is to pledge that they will never pass anything but a balanced budget for 2012 or for any year beyond that.  Without the permission of the House of Representatives, Barack Obama and the Democrats cannot continue their deficit spending.  The sad truth is that the Republicans have been enabling and actively participating in this debt binge all along.
A balanced budget would definitely hurt the economy, but at least it would not wreck our credit rating and cause our borrowing costs to multiply.
But is that what the Republicans are shooting for?
No.
It is being reported that the Republicans and the Democrats have tentatively agreed to between $1 trillion and $2 trillion in budget cuts over the next 10 years.
So that comes to $200 billion in spending cuts a year at most.
Considering the fact that we are running budget deficits of about a trillion and a half dollars a year, that is not nearly enough.
So don’t accuse me of wanting to kick the can down the road.  I want to actually do something substantial about the national debt.  I just don’t think it is a good idea to trash our credit rating in the process.
It is the Republicans and the Democrats in Congress that are kicking the can down the road.
Trillion dollar deficits are not acceptable.  Our nation is on the road to financial ruin.
But it is not just the federal government that is in massive financial trouble.
The reality is that we have “government debt problems” from coast to coast.
Did you hear that the government of Minnesota shut down the other day?
As the financial health of almost every single state government continues to decline, this type of thing is going to become more common.
In the state of Illinois things are so bad that some income tax refunds have not been paid since 2009.  The following is a brief excerpt from an article on the Economic Policy Journal blog….
I repeat, this is no time to own state or municipal bonds. The desperation level at various states and municipalities is getting more and more intense.
With the start of a new budget year just two days away, thousands of Illinois businesses are still waiting for state income tax refunds dating back to 2009.
In a recent article entitled “Is The Economy Improving?“, I went into greater detail about the horrific financial crisis that Illinois is facing….
*****
Did you know that things have gotten so bad in Illinois at this point that the Illinois state government is letting bills go unpaid for long periods of time on a regular basis?
It’s true.
Right now they have billions in unpaid bills and they are facing a financial future that is so bleak that it is almost indescribable.
In one recent article, author Stephen Lendman described the horrific financial crisis that Illinois is facing right now….
With spending exceeding revenues, and obligations not postponed, unpaid bills are growing “at a frightening rate. For instance, IGPA’s Fiscal Futures Model indicates (they) could reach $40 billion by July 1, 2013, with an associated delay in paying those bills of more than five years.”
Besides its $13 billion deficit and $6 billion in unpaid bills, its pension fund is about $130 billion in the red – a red flag that state workers may lose out altogether, wiping out their promised retirement savings.
But it isn’t just the state government that is having problems.  According to Cook County Treasurer Maria Pappas, the average household in Chicago would owe a whopping $63,525 if all local government debt was divided up equally among all of the households.
*****
How can we claim that our country is free when we are enslaved to such horrible debt burdens?
The borrower is always a servant of the lender.  As a nation, we are becoming a little bit less independent every single day.
So enjoy celebrating Independence Day while you still can.
If we continue on the path that we are currently on, nobody is going to be celebrating much of anything in the future.

    16 Reasons Why The United States Can No Longer Afford To Be The Police Of The World...

    16 Reasons Why The United States Can No Longer Afford To Be The Police Of The World...


    Did you know that the United States military is now bombing 6 different countries?  U.S. aircraft are conducting air strikes in Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, Libya, Yemen and now Somalia.  There is a U.S. military base in over half of the countries on the planet and U.S. military spending is over 7 times larger than the military spending of any other nation on earth.  Yes, the United States will always need a strong military.  But with our national debt exploding at an exponential rate, can the United States really afford to continue to be the police of the world?
    There are always going to be nutjobs in other countries that want to destroy the United States.  In fact, the more we bomb the more they seem to multiply.  The federal government seems obsessed with stamping out all terrorists wherever they may be found around the globe.  But how will we ever know if we have gotten all of them?  Does our government intend to occupy all of the countries of the Middle East eventually?  Do we really have to police the entire globe in order to feel secure at home?
    Trying to be the police of the world is getting awfully expensive.  We have run up almost 4 trillion dollars more debt since Barack Obama was elected.  Many thought that Barack Obama would reduce our foreign entanglements, but instead he has greatly expanded them.
    In an article posted on a major UK news source describing the new U.S. airstrikes in Somalia, Declan Walsh noted that this is now the 6th country that the U.S. military is bombing on a regular basis….
    Armed Predator and Reaper drones already operate in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq, Yemen and Libya, where they are controlled by the US military or the CIA.
    So are all of these airstrikes winning any “hearts and minds”?
    Hardly.
    Only 3 percent of the population of Pakistan supports our drone strikes in that country.
    What we are doing is not working.
    Perhaps it is time to fundamentally reassess our foreign policy.
    Barack Obama seems to have gotten a real taste for using the military.  He didn’t even bother to ask Congress when we started bombing Libya, and now there are persistent rumors that U.S. ground forces may soon be involved.
    In fact, high ranking Russian diplomat Dmitry Rogozin says that he is convinced that NATO is beginning preparations for a ground invasion of Libya….
    “I think that now we are witnessing the preparation stage of a ground operation which NATO, or at least some of its members… are ready to begin”
    But Libya is not the only place that U.S. troops may be sent to.
    The way that Obama administration officials are talking, war with Syria could potentially be on the horizon.
    Things are getting really crazy out there.  The U.S. government is absolutely drowning in debt and yet we think that we can push around everyone else in the world.
    This even extends to nations that are supposed to be our allies. According to the Jerusalem Post, Barack Obama has given Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu a one month ultimatum to agree to resume peace talks with the Palestinians based on pre-1967 borders.
    The U.S. government doesn’t even try to do much diplomacy in the Middle East anymore.  It seems like threats, ultimatums and bombings are the preferred tools.
    The rest of the world is going to remember our arrogance and our ruthlessness.  When the United States needs help someday, the rest of the world might not be very inclined to give it.
    Right now, the U.S. government is essentially bankrupt and the U.S. financial system is on the verge of the collapse.  We have got to stop spending so much money.
    The following are 16 reasons why the United States can no longer afford to be the police of the world….
    #1 Prior to the beginning of the “War on Terror” our national debt was under 6 trillion dollars.  Today, it has more than doubled and currently sits at a whopping 14.3 trillion dollars.
    #2 Today, the U.S. military is in nearly 130 different nations and it has a total of about 700 military bases around the globe.  It costs approximately 100 billion dollars each year to maintain these military bases.
    #3 U.S. military spending is greater than the military spending of China, Russia, Japan, India, and the rest of NATO combined.
    #4 The United States already accounts for 46.5% of all military spending on the planet.  China is next with only 6.6%.
    #5 If Bill Gates gave every penny of his fortune to the U.S. government, it would only cover the U.S. budget deficit for 15 days.
    #6 When you throw in all “off budget” items and other categories of “defense spending” not covered in the Pentagon budget you get a grand total ofsomewhere between $1.01 and $1.35 trillion spent on national defense in 2010.
    #7 The U.S. government borrows an average of about 168 million more dollarsevery single hour.
    #8 The Pentagon currently gobbles up 56 percent of all discretionary spending by the federal government.
    #9 Between 2007 and 2010, U.S. GDP grew by only 4.26%, but the U.S. national debt soared by 61%during that same time period.
    #10 The cost for the first week of airstrikes on Libya was 600 million dollars.  Keep in mind that the leader of the opposition in Libya has admitted that his forces contain large numbers of the same “al-Qaeda fighters” that were shooting at American troops in Iraq.  So we are going broke and we are helping al-Qaeda take power in Libya at the same time.
    #11 The total price tag for each F-22 fighter jet is approximately $350 million.
    #12 Over the past decade, the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have cost U.S. taxpayers well over a trillion dollars.
    #13 If you went out today and started spending one dollar every single second, it would take you over 31,000 years to spend one trillion dollars.
    #14 Since 2001, the total cost of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan breaks downto well over $3,600for every man, woman and child in the United States.
    #15 Just one day of the war in Afghanistan costs more money than it took to build the entire Pentagon.
    #16 The United States government is now responsible for more than a thirdof all the government debt in the entire world.
    The U.S. national debt is escalating out of control and all of these wars are not helping one bit.
    Occupying and bombing all of these nations is not even making us safer.  In fact, it is creating more enemies than it is destroying.
    In addition, our military is now spread so incredibly thin that there are real questions about our ability to respond if a major threat did actually arise.
    If you support our troops, then you should want the U.S. government to stop trying to police the world.  We are getting a lot of young men and women hurt and killed and we are accomplishing a whole lot of nothing.
    At the same time we are bombing nations all over the globe, Barack Obama is absolutely gutting our strategic nuclear arsenal and has made us far more vulnerable to real threats such as Russia and China.
    It is almost as if our government is cursed.  It just cannot seem to do anything right these days.  Virtually everything that either George W. Bush or Barack Obama has tried to do has been an utter failure.
    Look, I am pro-military.  My father was in the military.  The United States will always need a very strong military.
    But trying to police the world is stupid.  Occupying and bombing countries all over the Middle East is a massive strategic mistake and it is creating a lot of new enemies.
    Plus all of this military spending is contributing significantly to our national debt nightmare.
    If someone can explain why I am wrong I would love to hear it….
    Courtesy of infowars.com

    Gerald Celente: "Austerity Riots Will Come To The US"...

    Gerald Celente: "Austerity Riots Will Come To The US"...



    Courtesy of rt.com


    More and more of the world economy is crumbling and America doesn’t seem too far behind.
    While riots erupt in Greece over austerity measures imposed by the government, back home lay-offs are rampant on Wall Street with Goldman Sachs relieving over 200 employees from their positions today. Is there a way out before Americans begin to emulate the Greeks?
    “The economy continues to decline with no recovery in sight,” 
    says Gerald Celente of the Trends Research Institute. “It is hitting everyone and Goldman Sachs is taking the hit as more of that bailout money dries up and reality bites.”
    “Whether it is in Tunisia, whether it is in Egypt, whether it is in the UK . . . it is only going to get much worse,” says Celente.
    “There is no way out and the people are angry.”
    Celente says he has seen this coming all along, and as Americans are becoming more and more aware of the hardships that are hitting home, they will start to rebel as well. “The Greek people know that if you don’t stand up they are going to mow them down,” Celente tells RT. He argues that austerity only brings unemployment and unhappiness, and “when you get really hungry you are going to see the riots continue to escalate.” It is only a matter of time before it crosses the Atlantic.
    “The banks are failing and they want the people to bail them out,” he says. The people, however, aren’t about ready to stand for that.
    “The people know the score,” he says.
    “When people lose everything and have nothing left to lose, they lose it!”

    Congressmen Declare Debt Ceiling Unconstitutional...

    Congressmen Declare Debt Ceiling Unconstitutional...



    Courtesy of rt.com


    If Democrats and Republicans can’t decide on a decision regarding the debt ceiling dilemma, some are now saying that it doesn’t even matter — and that laying out a limit is actually unconstitutional.
    A group of lawmakers are combing over the Constitution to see if the Treasury can go ahead and ignore Congress if a compromise can’t be made between both sides of the aisle. Now some politicians say that the Fourteenth Amendment might make the whole debate a moot point.
    The legislation, added to the Constitution in 1868, states that "The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law… shall not be questioned.” While, like much of the Constitution, the wording is vague and open to interpretation, Delaware Senator Chris Coons tells The Huffington Post that he is among a group of lawmakers seeing if this can mean that negations aren’t even necessary.
    "This is an issue that's been raised in some private debate between senators as to whether in fact we can default, or whether that provision of the Constitution can be held up as preventing default," Coons says.
    "I don't think, as of a couple weeks ago, when this was first raised, it was seen as a pressing option,” he adds, but with the nation facing a debt limit deadline of only a month away as of this weekend, Coons says the amendment is “going to get a pretty strong second look as a way of saying, 'Is there some way to save us from ourselves?'"
    In an article published in The Atlantic earlier this year, legal scholar Garrett Epps writes, "This provision makes clear that both the monies our nation owes to bondholders, and the sums promised in legislation to those receiving pensions set by law from the federal government, must be paid regardless of the political whims of the current congressional majority.”
    If this is indeed the case, Democrats and Republicans won’t need to come to an agreement over raising the ceiling. Rather it will be the constitutional obligation of America to pay its debts, whether or not its limit is lifted.
    The White House has not offered commentary on the constitutionality of the issue so far, but at this week’s press conference, President Barack Obama told reporters, "I'm not a Supreme Court justice, so I'm not going to put my constitutional law professor hat on."
    Meanwhile, those that helped put America in this place are only looking to make a penny from it. “Wall Street gets extremely wealthy off of our debt,” says economist and author Les Leopold to RT. “They are looking for a way to profit off of this,” he says, and adds that they will find a way to do so whether or not the debt ceiling dilemma is solved anytime soon.

    No Extended Unemployment Starting Today...

    No Extended Unemployment Starting Today...





    Courtesy of rt.com

    While more and more Americans are filing for unemployment, the benefits those applicants stand to receive are about to be drastically diminished.
    Starting next week, laid-off workers across the country will no longer be able to reap in the extended unemployment benefits that the federal government has provided since 2008. While states will still offer an average of 26 weeks of assistance after termination, it looks like help will stop right there.
    Those qualified for unemployment benefits have been eligible for an additional 73 weeks of assistance in some states, but now those laid-off will only be able to get state-funded help, which drops off after six months in most cases.
    "There's a real potential cliff coming for unemployed people," Judy Conti, a lobbyist for the National Employment Law Project, says to the Huffington Post. She says that federal assistance is one of the “needed programs” that Congress needs to reinstate.
    As of May of this year, 6.2 million Americans have been out of work for six months or longer. With the average unemployed person being unable to find work for around 40 weeks, they are looking to face over three months of making ends meet without the help of the US government.
    Under the current federal benefits program, nearly 4 million people are being assisted. As long as the unemployment rate has been above 7.2 percent, the government has never suspended their benefits program. The current statistic for the United States is at around 9.1 percent.
    "Quite frankly, this will be nothing short of a disaster – for those workers and their families, and for local economies across the country," adds Conti. "It's not too early for Congress to hold good-faith and open-minded negotiations about how to keep these federal programs up and running until the economy recovers enough, and creates enough jobs, that the programs are no longer needed."
    Federal unemployment assistance is usually funded through a 35-year-old “temporary” unemployment tax, which typically costs private employers around $14 per year, per worker. President George W Bush proposed extending the tax in his 2009 budget, and President Obama was hoping to make the tax permanent in his 2012 budget. Both presidents had argued that the tax was necessary to help sustain federal unemployment trust funds, but other lawmakers are championing the repeal.
    “The death of any tax on jobs, no matter how big or small, is a historic moment and one to be celebrated,’’ says Rep Dave Camp (R-MI) to the Associated Press. “The fact that it has taken 35 years for this ‘temporary’ tax to expire clearly illustrates the dangers of higher taxes – once in place, they are unlikely to ever go away.’’
    While Obama is urging Congress to raise taxes on businesses, some of the biggest employers in the country are looking to reap in the benefits while millions of Americans will be left in the dark. By ditching the tax, Wal-Mart is looking to save around $20 million a year.

    Overmedicated Americans Go Violent...


    Courtesy of rt.com

    The good old days of robbing banks and liquor stores are going the way of the dinosaur as the new crime catching across America is knocking-over drugstores from coast to coast.
    With more and more Americans developing addictions to prescription drugs, the country is experiencing a surge in violent crimes as fiends are taking drastic measures to fuel their fix.
    Prescription drug abuse is nothing new in America, but not only is the problem getting worse in the States, but an increasing number of addicts are resorting to violent crimes to avoid withdrawal.
    One study by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) finds that prescription opiod abuse increased by 111 percent between 2004 and 2008, with almost 2 million Americans admitting to abusing the class of drug ever year, which includes codeine, hydrocodone, oxycodone and others. Expectedly, as use increases, so does misuse. SAMHSA figures reveal that those seeking treatment for opiod abuse made up only 8 percent of the total patient population in 1999, but ten years later that statistic has changed drastically, with one-third of treatment admissions being related to opiate abuse.
    In another study from the National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse (CASA), 15 percent of American high schoolers admitted to abusing prescription pills.
    “There has been a gradual increase in prescription pain killer admissions for quite a few years now. But it's still a great concern because it shows that it's a continuing problem out there," says Deborah Trunzo, of SAMHSA's Center for Behavioral Health Statistics to Medscape Medical News.
    With more and more people developing dependencies, a crime epidemic is overtaking America as addicts attempt to obtain opiates at all costs.
    This is far from a global crisis, too. Americans make up around 80 percent of the world’s prescription painkiller users and abusers, reports IMS Health. And now, according to a report from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, prescription painkillers have surpassed illicit drugs such as heroin and cocaine as the leading cause of fatal overdoses.
    It’s not the drugs themselves that are doing all the killing, though.
    Last month four people were murdered at a Long Island pharmacy when David Laffer allegedly open fired in a New York drug store after emptying the store of their entire supply of hydrocodone. His wife, Melinda Brady, was later charged in related crimes after she told police that her husband had committed the armed robbery so that she could have the pills. He killed a 17-year-old clerk and a middle-aged pharmacist before shooting a couple in the back of the head and taking hydrocodone-based drugs from the shelves.
    A month earlier across the country, an Oakland, California drug store was robbed at gunpoint by two masked men seeking a prescription narcotic cough syrup rich in codeine. If they don’t abuse the tonic themselves, bottles can fetch upwards of $200 a piece on the streets. 
    It seems almost too obvious to the California Board of Pharmacy’s Virginia Herold.“People want prescription drugs and they see pharmacies as where to get them,”  she tells Scripps Howard.
    65 pharmacies in the state of Florida were held up in 2010. In all the country saw 686 drug store robberies that year, an increase of 80 percent since 2006. While the drug-deal-gone-bad scenario is a stigma which is often associated with the poor and impoverished of inner-city America, RdPatrol, the country’s only database for pharmacy crime, says around 80 percent of the incidents are perpetrated by white males.
    "These are very typically addicts who possibly can no longer get controlled substances in the manner they used to get them," said Rick Zenuch, director of law enforcement liaison for Purdue Pharma, which makes the narcotic painkiller Oxycontin. "This really is a crime of desperation and that makes for a much more dangerous suspect."
    Andrew Kolodny, president of Physicians for Responsible Opioid Prescribing, tells the Associate Press that many patients are turned into addicts after taking legitimate prescriptions. Eventually, however, it is not uncommon for them to turn to crime if they are laid-off and left without their prescription but with an undying addiction.
    "People with addiction who could be perfectly good people will do all sorts of horrible things to maintain their supply,"Kolodny tells the AP.
    Pharmacist Greg Hamby agrees. Speaking to The Inquisitr recently, he says, “Many times . . . people can lose jobs and with certain things with health care we see lack of insurance now.”
    “It seems to me the situation is becoming worse,” he adds.
    He says that recently a man walked into his store, went behind the counter and held a clerk at knife point, demanding hydrocodone.
    These incidents are far from isolated and only getting worse.
    Mark Shirey, 51, robbed an Idaho pharmacy of their Oxycontin inventory after telling a clerk he had something in his briefcase that “could light the place up.” Ten hours later a SWAT team busted into his house to take him into custody and recover the drugs. There, he resisted arrested.
    In Virginia, a 27-year-old white male tried robbing a Lynchburg drug store twice in one day. The second time, Michael Edward Towle entered the pharmacy with a three-foot-long samurai sword.
    Across the state in McLean, VA, Jonathan Ross Carlton, 23, was recently sentenced to 60 months in prison after robbing a string of pharmacies. He traveled throughout the Washington DC area taking 80 milligram pills of Oxycontin from drug stores. He used a gun to hold up several pharmacies, and managed to accumulate over 2,000 pills during his spree.
    In Camden, four years ago a Philly man pleaded guilty to robbing 13 pharmacies of Oxycontin, Oxycodone, Endocet and Xanax. He packed a semiautomatic handgun as he robbed drug stores throughout Philadelphia and New Jersey.
    After an incident in a middle-class Staten Island town, the employees there went with what they figures was the best solution to the spree — they made a sign for the front window: “We do not stock oxycodone or Roxicodone."
    As addicts try to snuff their itch and pack their wallets, this trend doesn’t seem to be disappearing. In a Seattle courtroom last year, a 14-time felon talked about how he transitioned from vehicle prowling and a string of misdemeanors into drug store hold-ups:
    "Robbing pharmacies for OxyContin is the only way to go,” said Jacob Harley Shook in court documents. He held-up a handful of Washington state drug stores with an array of guns.

    Health Ranger - 'Health Care Only Cares About Profit'...

    Health Ranger - 'Health Care Only Cares About Profit'...



    Courtesy of rt.com


    “In the United States,” says Mike Adams, “we have a monopolistic health care system that is designed to generate profits, not public health.”
    Adams, the editor-in-chief of NaturalNews.com, says that much of America is driven to believe that they need drugs, and with a monopolistic health care system unlike any other in the world, it isn’t the wellbeing of their clients that health care systems are looking out for, he says, but the corporations’ bank accounts.
    In America, says Adams, people are trapped in a system of dependence on disease treatment. “The system doesn’t really have the motivation to teach people how to be healthy,” but rather rely on unnecessary — yet costly — medication.
    “Other countries are more open to generic drugs, which tend to lower the cost of conventional health care,” says Adams, and while nations abroad might be more willing to encourage alternative methods of treatment, American advertisements insist that the country is in need of prescription pills — and as a result the clients of health care systems have an insatiable craving for medication.
    This isn’t necessary, though, attests Adams. Instead, he says, it’s “a clear example of corporations really betraying the public interest just so they can make more money.”
    “The US has mastered that art it seems in the drug industry.”
    Drugs are prescribed 50 percent more in America than elsewhere, and children are three times more likely to be given antidepressants than European nations. “People think they need a drug to control every aspect of their experience,”says Adams. And antidepressants? “Feeling sad from time to time is not a disease,” he says. “It’s a human emotion.”
    Advertisers can convince a lot of people that they are sick, says Adams, and the statistics show that he is certainly right. Don’t let the name “health care” fool you. The only thing these corporations care about is your money.

    Friday, July 1, 2011

    US Wars Cost $4 Trillion...

    US Wars Cost $4 Trillion...

    Courtesy of rt.com

    War, what is it good for? If you ask researchers at Brown University, a new study says around $4 trillion down the drain and nearly a quarter of a million lives lost.
    Economics, anthropologists, lawyers and researchers at the Ivy League institute have been slaving away at the study which projects the price of the Afghan and Iraq wars to be at around $4 trillion by the time the US wraps up operations overseas. Earlier the Congressional Budget Office released its own numbers, alleging that the cost thorough 2021 would be a mere $1.8 trillion. Brown researchers, however, predict that the US government has already spent at least $2.3 trillion in funds, as the US continues to combat despite already eliminating both Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden.
    Additionally, 6,000 US troops and 2,300 contractors have died since September 11, with researchers estimating that another 200,000 will lose their lives as a result of the war by 2021. 137,000 civilians in Afghanistan and Iraq have already perished, and 8 million people have been displaced, says the study.
    "We decided we needed to do this kind of rigorous assessment of what it cost to make those choices to go to war," study co-director Catherine Lutz tells Reuters. "Politicians, we assumed, were not going to do that kind of assessment."
    Researchers behind the Costs of War study are asking the government to be more transparent about the toll the troops are taking. On the website for their study, they plead that “However one judges the US waging of the wars in Afghanistan, Iraq and Pakistan, at the very least, we should know what each of those wars has been like.We should know who has been killed, what kinds of wounds have been suffered and what kinds of economic costs and consequences have been incurred. Those costs have been consistently minimized, misunderstood or hidden from public view.”
    “Transparency and accountability for war budgets and costs must include not only what has been spent, but the amounts that the US will be obliged to spend by virtue of the fact of going to war,” it adds.
    They note that the government has promised Afghanistan over $5 billion in reconstruction funding. Of course there will also be the costs of Medicare for veterans when they reach 65 and ongoing financial assistance for those injured in the line of duty.